Secret Service officers have rejected a number of requests from former President Donald Trump’s safety workforce to extend their manpower and sources for main incidents over the previous two years, in line with a brand new report from The Washington Publish.
The Washington Publish, citing “4 individuals acquainted with the request,” stated brokers assigned to guard Trump “requested magnetometers and extra brokers to display Trump attendees at sporting occasions and different giant public gatherings, in addition to further snipers and particular groups at different out of doors occasions.”
These requests had been “rejected by senior company officers, who cited a wide range of causes, together with an absence of sources in an company that has lengthy struggled with staffing shortages.”
Rep. Michael Waltz (R-FL) was among the many first to boost questions on whether or not the Secret Service had denied Trump’s request for added safety.
“I’ve very dependable sources telling me that there have been repeated requests for stronger Secret Service safety for President Trump. Denied by Secretary Mayorkas,” he stated, hours after the taking pictures.
I’ve very dependable sources telling me that there have been repeated requests for stronger Secret Service safety for President Trump.
Secretary Mayorkas denied. https://t.co/RazOVcJgCk
— Consultant Mike Waltz (@michaelgwaltz) July 14, 2024
Secret Service spokesman Anthony Guglielmi initially pushed again in opposition to stories that such a request had been made after which denied by the company.
“There’s a false declare {that a} member of the previous president’s workforce requested further safety sources they usually had been denied. That is completely false. In actual fact, we now have added defensive sources and know-how and capabilities as a part of the elevated marketing campaign journey tempo,” he stated the day after the taking pictures.
There’s a false declare {that a} member of the previous president’s workforce requested further safety sources and was denied. That is completely false. Certainly, we now have added protecting sources and applied sciences and capabilities as a part of the elevated marketing campaign journey tempo
— Anthony Guglielmi (@SecretSvcSpox) July 14, 2024
However the newest stories recommend that these claims had been right.
“The Secret Service, after initially rejecting requests for added safety, is now acknowledging that some could also be rejected,” the Washington Publish report continued. “The revelation comes as company veterans say the company has been compelled to make tough choices amid competing calls for, a rising roster of protectors and restricted funding.”
Jon Hasson shared a collection of screenshots displaying the altering narrative from begin to end, from Waltz’s declare to the Washington Publish’s obvious affirmation.
“July 13: Rep. @michaelwaltz claims Secret Service rejected Trump’s request for extra safety; July 14: Secret Service says it didn’t deny Trump’s request; Right now: Secret Service admits it rejected Trump’s request.
July 13: Rep @michaelwaltz declare
The Secret Service has rejected Trump’s request for extra safetyJuly 14: The Secret Service says it didn’t deny Trump’s request
TODAY: Secret Service admits it “could have” denied Trump’s request pic.twitter.com/ThkYFmUfCp
— John Hasson (@SonofHas) July 20, 2024
